Sunday, September 22, 2013

Humanism - Martines


Martines analysis on humanism discussed, among other things, the new out look on social and political interests. Humanism valued the ancient greek and roman ideals and reinforced them in their own contemporary settings. Education was no longer marginal, it was not restricted to idea's popularized by the church but valued secular idea's, ones that may have reinforced religious notions but always promoted individual worth. "'(T)he careful study of the past enlarges our foresight in contemporary affairs and affords to citizens and to monarchs lessons of incitement or warning in the ordering of public policy. From history also we draw our store of examples of moral precepts'" (Martines,195/Burni) Understanding ones own history was vital for scholars like Burni. It is inefficient to continue repeating the same social/political mistakes, to ensure progression for ones self and for ones society, one must appreciate and understand what practices functioned efficiently (functions that resulted in production of art/architecture, advances in science, career/educational opportunities, ect)  compared to practices that were detrimental to society (functions that resulted in oppression, further separating social classes, war, prejudice, ect). Restricting ones own knowledge to carefully selected passages from the new and old testament was inefficient. The only way to progress ones self and society was understanding all aspects of history, beyond the restrictions of religion.

3 comments:

  1. I think you have a really nice summary of the reading, however the prominence of language, grammar,and rhetoric in regard to Latin seems like a big part of Humanism. Although parts of humanism seem arrogant and obviously very patriarchal, I can admire their focus on becoming well rounded individuals. I thought the bit about running and leaping in order to be prepared for the future, which included marriage was funny.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I believe the real intention of the Humanists was to learn from antiquity, Greeks and Latin, in how to handle real life experiences with wisdom and virtue. However, I believe, too, that history continues to repeat itself in making the same mistakes in eloquently speaking the language for personal power and prestige.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You mention the Papacy at this time period as a kind of corrupt business, and while the Humanists certainly looked to escape this thinking, I think it's important to note that the Humanists weren't exactly a fair and all inclusive group of players either. Only people who could really afford to entwine themselves in a Humanist education could really call themselves so, and forget it if you couldn't pick up the Latin.

    ReplyDelete